Review: Methodological Limitations for OSCC Biomarkers

Share this content:
Review: Methodological Limitations for OSCC Biomarkers
Review: Methodological Limitations for OSCC Biomarkers

MONDAY, Dec. 5, 2016 (HealthDay News) -- Methodological concerns have limited the analysis of saliva-based biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), according to a review published online Nov. 29 in Head and Neck.

Vitor T. Stuani, D.D.S., from the University of São Paulo in Brazil, and colleagues conducted a systematic review of 28 studies that established a comparison between the levels of saliva-based markers found in patients with OSCC versus and the levels found in cancer-free individuals.

The researchers found that only 12 studies showed some caution with oral conditions before collection of samples. The studies assessed a wide range of potential markers; the comparison was limited because each marker was hardly explored by more than one article.

"Although the articles included in this review bring important contributions to the scientific field, there is no set of reliable information to place any of the salivary markers evaluated as a sentinel for diagnosis of OSCC," the authors write

Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Share this content:

is free, fast, and customized just for you!

Already a member?

Sign In Now »

Drug Lookup

Browse drugs by: BrandGenericDisease

Trending Activities

All Professions


Sign up for myCME e-newsletters


More in Home

FDA Warns of Possible Heart Risks Linked to Clarithromycin

FDA Warns of Possible Heart Risks Linked to ...

Agency advising doctors to consider prescribing other antibiotics to patients with coronary heart disease

Artificial Intelligence May Help Prevent Physician Burnout

Artificial Intelligence May Help Prevent Physician Burnout

Many potential uses for AI, including improving searches and documentation, selecting treatment

Benzodiazepine Use Declining in Older Adults

Benzodiazepine Use Declining in Older Adults

Findings based on assessment of incidence, prevalence of use in three countries from 2010-2016

is free, fast, and customized just for you!

Already a member?

Sign In Now »