Recommendations Developed for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses

This article originally appeared here.
Share this content:
Recommendations Developed for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
Recommendations Developed for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses

THURSDAY, Sept. 15, 2016 (HealthDay News) -- A new set of recommendations has been developed for conduct and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses, according to a report published in the Sept. 13 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

Gillian D. Sanders, Ph.D., from the Duke Clinical Research Institute in Durham, N.C., and colleagues reviewed the state of the field and developed recommendations to improve the quality of cost-effectiveness analyses. Members of the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine developed recommendations by consensus over 3.5 years. The recommendations were reviewed by external reviewers and via a public posting process.

The authors recommended the concept of a "reference case" and a set of standard methodological practices that all cost-effectiveness analyses should follow in order to improve quality and comparability. Two reference case analyses should be reported in all cost-effectiveness analyses: one based on a health care sector perspective and one based on a societal perspective. The panel also recommended use of an "impact inventory," which is a structured table that includes consequences intended to clarify the scope and boundaries of the two reference case analyses.

"Major changes include the recommendation to perform analyses from two reference case perspectives and to provide an impact inventory to clarify included consequences," the authors write.

Several authors disclosed financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)
Editorial (subscription or payment may be required)

Share this content:

is free, fast, and customized just for you!

Already a member?

Sign In Now »


Sign up for myCME e-newsletters


Drug Lookup

Browse drugs by: BrandGenericDisease

More in Home

NTproBNP Levels Are Significantly Lower in Blacks

NTproBNP Levels Are Significantly Lower in Blacks

Higher NTproBNP levels linked to increased risk of death; this association did not differ by race

Data May Weigh on Pros/Cons of Expanded Care Optometry

Data May Weigh on Pros/Cons of Expanded Care ...

Majority of residents in Kentucky, Oklahoma, New Mexico live within 30 minutes of ophthalmologist

Gaps Seen Between Hearing Loss, Receipt of Medical Evaluation, Tx

Gaps Seen Between Hearing Loss, Receipt of Medical ...

About 20.6 percent of those with hearing less than excellent/good had visited doctor for hearing issues

is free, fast, and customized just for you!

Already a member?

Sign In Now »