Glycemic Index Poor Indicator of Blood Glucose Response

This article originally appeared here.
Share this content:
Glycemic Index Poor Indicator of Blood Glucose Response
Glycemic Index Poor Indicator of Blood Glucose Response

THURSDAY, Sept. 8, 2016 (HealthDay News) -- Glycemic index values of the same foods can vary widely and may be an unreliable indicator of blood glucose response, according to a study published online Sept. 7 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Researchers checked blood glucose responses in 63 healthy adults after eating the same amount of white bread three different times over 12 weeks. The investigators found that glycemic index values varied an average of 20 percent among individuals and 25 percent between different study participants.

"Glycemic index values appear to be an unreliable indicator even under highly standardized conditions, and are unlikely to be useful in guiding food choices," lead author Nirupa Matthan, Ph.D., of the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Human Nutrition Research Center at Tufts University in Boston, said in a university news release. "If someone eats the same amount of the same food three times, their blood glucose response should be similar each time, but that was not observed in our study. A food that is low glycemic index for you one time you eat it could be high the next time, and it may have no impact on blood sugar for me."

Based on these findings, Matthan said using the glycemic index wasn't practical for food labeling or in dietary guidelines at the individual level.

Abstract
Full Text (subscription or payment may be required)

Share this content:

is free, fast, and customized just for you!

Already a member?

Sign In Now »


Sign up for myCME e-newsletters


Drug Lookup

Browse drugs by: BrandGenericDisease


More in Home

Both Statin, Non-Statin Therapies Effective for Lowering LDL

Both Statin, Non-Statin Therapies Effective for Lowering LDL

Dietary changes, other meds, and even surgery can lower cardiovascular risk similarly to statins

Negative Effects Seen With Video Gaming 9 Hours/Week

Negative Effects Seen With Video Gaming 9+ Hours/Week

Benefits seen with one hour a week, but behavioral problems appear to rise at nine hours a week

Improved Adult Lung Function Linked to Childhood Farm Life

Improved Adult Lung Function Linked to Childhood Farm ...

First study to report beneficial effects of growing up on a farm on adult FEV1

is free, fast, and customized just for you!

Already a member?

Sign In Now »