This CME Activity has expired and is no longer available for credit.
Balancing the Science and Art of Managing RA: A Focus on Treating to Target Clinical Conversations about the Multidisciplinary Approach to Patient Care
Time to Complete
November 7, 2012
August 7, 2013
1.00 / AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)TM 1.00 / CE for Nurses
Support for this activity has been made possible through an independent educational grant from
Over the last two decades, advances in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have caused a “sea change” in the way that clinicians approach the management of RA. This movement towards a “treat-to-target” approach is based upon evidence that (a) proves early treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) results in less joint damage and better physical functioning; (b) demonstrates improved outcomes with biologic agents; (c) provides validated core variables and composite measures to reliably assess disease activity; (d) shows treating to target regimens lead to better outcomes than traditional approaches; and (e) confirms that remission can be achieved in many patients.1
Recognizing the important roles rheumatologists, nurse practitioners, nurses, and physician assistants all play in the care of patients with RA, this activity will focus on a multidisciplinary approach to care.
1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, et al; T2T Expert Committee. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force [published corrections appear in Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1349; Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1519]. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:631-637
This activity is designed to meet the educational needs of rheumatologists, nurses/nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and other healthcare providers who are involved in the care and management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
As a result of participating in this educational activity, learners will be better able to:
Implement practices that reflect treat-to-target strategies to support the goal of reaching remission in patients with RA
Incorporate tools that are effective and practical to assess early RA and to monitor response to treatment
Educate patients about treatment options and side effects in order to actively participate in their treatment decisions
Identify barriers to implementing treat-to-target strategies in clinical practice
Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
According to the disclosure policy of American Academy of CME, Inc., all faculty, planning committee members, editors, managers and other individuals who are in a position to control content are required to disclose any relevant relationships with any commercial interests related to this activity. The existence of these interests or relationships is not viewed as implying bias or decreasing the value of the presentation. All educational materials are reviewed for fair balance, scientific objectivity and levels of evidence.
ANCC Accreditation Feedback Line: 1-866-262-9730
The Accreditation Program of the American Nurses Credentialing Center is interested in the opinions and perspectives of the participants in accredited continuing nursing education activities, particularly those perspectives related to the presence of perceived bias* in the continuing education. For this reason, we are now providing a toll-free telephone number. Participants may access this number at any time to:
1. Tell us of any noted bias or conflict of interest in the education 2. Tell us of any concerns, compliments, or opinions 3. Tell us of a great experience 4. Tell us of an unpleasant experience 5. Tell us your thoughts on the process
Just call and tell us! 1-866-262-9730
*Bias is defined as preferential influence that causes a distortion of opinion or of facts. Commercial bias may occur when an educational activity promotes one or more product(s) (drugs, devices, services, software, hardware, etc). This definition is not all inclusive and participants may use their own interpretation in deciding if a presentation is biased.
NOTE: Statements of commercial support and/or conflict of interest disclosures do not represent bias. Such statements inform the learner that the provider has implemented a mechanism to identify and resolve all conflicts of interest prior to delivery of the educational material.
If you have any questions relating to the accreditation for this activity, please contact: John JD Juchniewicz, MCIS, CCMEP American Academy of CME, Inc. 2275 West County Line Road Suite 6-329 Jackson, NJ 08527 E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org www.academycme.org
Kori Dewing, DNP, ARNP Virginia Mason Medical Center Rheumatology Department Seattle, Washington
Ms. Dewing has no relevant financial relationships with any commercial interests.
Gurjit S. Kaeley, MD, MRCP, FACR Division Chief Associate Professor of Medicine Rheumatology Fellowship Program Director Director, Musculoskeletal Ultrasound University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville, Florida
Gurjit S. Kaeley, MD, MRCP, FACR Consultant – for clinical trial design: Abbott Laboratories Grant Recipient/Research Support: SonoSite and Esaote (Unrestricted equipment loan to University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville) Promotional Speakers’ Bureau: Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Pfizer
Joan McTigue, PA-C University of Florida College of Medicine and VA Medical Center Division of Rheumatology Gainesville, Florida
Ms. McTigue has no relevant financial relationships with any commercial interests.
William F.C. Rigby, MD (Activity Director) Professor of Medicine, Microbiology and Immunology Division of Rheumatology Department of Medicine Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center Lebanon, New Hampshire
William F.C. Rigby, MD (Activity Director) Advisory Board – for scientific information: Bristol-Myers Squibb, UCB Pharma Consultant – for marketing purposes: Hoffman-La Roche Consultant – for clinical trial design: Crescendo Bioscience, Hoffman-La Roche Promotional Speakers’ Bureau: Hoffman-La Roche
Independent Clinical Peer Reviewer Rodolfo V. Curiel, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Rheumatology Fellowship, Program Director, The George Washington University, Washington, DC: No relevant financial relationships with any commercial interests.
Planning Committee Disclosure
John JD Juchniewicz, MCIS, CCMEP, and Natalie Kirkwood, JD, BSN, RN (Lead Nurse Planner) American Academy of CME, Inc., and Deborah Dean, Michelle Yechout, and Wendy Gloffke, PhD (editorial assistance provided), Alliance Medical Communications: No relevant financial relationships with any commercial interests.
AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)TM
This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of American Academy of CME, Inc., (Academy) and Alliance Medical Communications. American Academy of CME, Inc., is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
American Academy of CME, Inc., designates this enduring material for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
CE for Nurses
American Academy of CME, Inc, is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center’s Commission on Accreditation.
American Academy of CME, Inc., designates this educational activity for 1.00 contact hour.
Disclosure of Unlabeled Use
This activity will not review off-label or investigational information.
This activity is designed for use by health care professionals for educational purposes only. The opinions expressed in this educational activity are those of the faculty, and do not represent those of of American Academy of CME, Inc., Alliance Medical Communications, or American Nurses Credentialing Council’s Commission on Accreditation. This activity is intended as a supplement to existing knowledge, published information, and practice guidelines. Learners should appraise the information presented critically, and draw conclusions only after careful consideration of all available scientific information.
In addition, American Academy of CME, Inc., requires all faculty/authors to note the level of evidence for any patient care recommendation made during their presentations. For this activity, the Academy used the Category of Evidence and the Strength of Recommendation classification schemes from the 1999 British Medical Journal Clinical Guidelines (Shekelle PG, et al. Clinical Guidelines: Developing Guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7183):593-596.) for levels of evidence.
Category of Evidence:
Evidence for metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials
Evidence from at least one randomized controlled trial
Evidence from at least one controlled study without randomization
Evidence from at least one other type of quasiexperimental study
Evidence from nonexperimental descriptive studies, such as comparative studies, correlation studies, and casecontrol studies
Evidence from expert committee reports or opinions or clinical experience of respected authorities, or both
Strength of Recommendation:
Directly based on category I evidence
Directly based on category II evidence or extrapolated recommendation from category I evidence
Directly based on category III evidence or extrapolated recommendation from category I or II evidence
Directly based on category IV evidence or extrapolated recommendation from category I, II or III evidence
The information presented at this activity is for continuing medical education purposes only and is not meant to substitute for the independent medical judgment of a physician regarding diagnosis and treatment of a specific patient’s medical condition.
There are no fees to participate in the activity. Participants must review the CME information including the learning objectives and disclosure statements, as well as the content of the activity. To receive CME/CE credit for your participation, please complete the pre-activity survey and post-test (achieving a passing grade of 70% or greater), and program evaluation.